ActRight

UK, Belgium, Germany, Sweden at risk of rise in millionaire outflows amidst emerging signs of unrest.

Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet.

The liberal media are only too happy to call pro-life presidential candidates “extreme.” But they’ll never dare apply the same label to pro-choice candida

"If Ted Cruz’s mouth is moving, he’s lying.”

Donald Trump tweeted a new Wisconsin poll a little while ago, thanking voters for it. But the only problem is he’s losing in the poll. By one point, but still, he’s losing! So I guess T…

"D.C. Madam" lawyer Blair Sibley threatens to defy gag order, release client phone list within the next two weeks VIDEO

To be clear, a half a million dollars is not a small donation, and, at the time, it was the largest expense that the PAC had paid out. So why the heck would

Clinton, Trump Have Big Leads In New York Primaries, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Adopted Daughter Thumps Native Son, Edges Kasich

The Havana Tribune, a state-controlled Cuban newspaper, calls President Obama 'negro' in an editorial.

Or at minimum, ending "wealth hording" by forcing "well-endowed private institutions [to] share their assets"

Influenced by the relentless campaign of incitement that has fostered genocidal hatred toward Jews in generations of Palestinians, all he cared about was stabbing as many civilians as possible.

Progressivism has a history of racism spanning a century that the Left does it's best to conceal and forget while accusing the Right of racial bias and bigotry.

Watch YAF Foundation's Newt Gingrich at East TN State Univ. on Livestream.com. The Hon. Newt Gingrich will speak on "Civility in Politics." After the 1994 mid-term elections, Newt Gingrich became the first Republican Speaker of the House in 40 years. Most of the legislative items in his well-publicized "Contract with America" were passed by the House and many became law. His term as Speaker was marked by his opposition to many of Clinton's policies, which led to a budget showdown, government shutdowns, and acrimonious impeachment proceedings. However, Gingrich and Clinton also reached agreements on welfare reform, a capital gains tax cut, and a budget deal that led to four straight balanced budgets. Gingrich resigned from Congress in 1999. Gingrich authored several books, and stayed involved in politics, serving as a political commentator and a consultant for various think tanks. In May 2011 Gingrich announced he would seek the Republican nomination for president in 2012.

After dozens of contests featuring cliffhangers, buzzer-beaters, and a ton of flagrant fouls, we’re down to the Final Four: Sanders, Clinton, Cruz, and Trump. (If Kasich pulls a miracle, he’ll get his own column.) The world wants to know: What are their foreign policies? Herewith, four candidates and four schools: pacifist, internationalist, unilateralist, and mercantilist. (1) Bernie Sanders, pacifist. His pacifism is part swords-into-plowshares utopianism, part get-thee-gone isolationism. Emblematic was the November 14 Democratic debate, which was supposed to focus on the economy but occurred the day after the Paris massacre. Sanders objected to starting the debate with a question about Paris. He did not prevail, however, and answered the first question with some anti-terror pablum that immediately gave way to an impassioned attack on his usual “handful of billionaires.” #ad#Sanders boasts of voting against the Iraq War. But he also voted against the 1991 Gulf War. His reaction to all such dilemmas is the same anti-imperialist/pacifist reflex: Stay away, but if we must get involved, let others lead. That’s for means. As for ends, Sanders’s foreign-policy objectives are invariably global and universal, beginning above all with climate change. The rest is foreign-policy-as-social-work do-goodism, most especially undoing the work of U.S. imperialism. Don’t be surprised if President Sanders hands Guantanamo Bay over to the Castros, although Alaska looks relatively safe for now. Closest historical analog: George McGovern. (2) Hillary Clinton, internationalist. The “Clinton/Obama” foreign policy from Ukraine to Iran to the South China Sea has been a demonstrable failure. But in trying to figure out what President Clinton would do in the future, we need to note that she often gave contrary advice, generally more assertive and aggressive than President Obama’s, that was overruled — most notably, keeping troops in Iraq beyond 2011 and early arming of the Syrian rebels. RELATED: Libya Debacle Undermines Clinton’s Foreign-Policy Credentials  The Libya adventure was her grand attempt at humanitarian interventionism. She’s been chastened by the disaster that followed. Her worldview is traditional, post-Vietnam liberal internationalism — America as the indispensable nation, but consciously restraining its exercise of power through multilateralism and near-obsessive legalism. Closest historical analog: the Bill Clinton foreign policy of the 1990s. #share# (3) Ted Cruz, unilateralist. The most aggressive of the three contenders thus far. Wants post–Cold War U.S. leadership restored. Is prepared to take risks and act alone when necessary. Pledges to tear up the Iran deal, cement the U.S.–Israel alliance, and carpet-bomb the Islamic State. RELATED: Many GOP Foreign-Policy Leaders Are Suspicious of Ted Cruz  Overdoes it with “carpet” — it implies Dresden — although it was likely just an attempt at rhetorical emphasis. He’s of the school that will not delay action while waiting on feckless allies or farcical entities like the U.N. Closest analog: Ronald Reagan. (4) Donald Trump, mercantilist. He promises to make America strong, for which, he explains, he must first make America rich. Treating countries like companies, he therefore promises to play turnaround artist for a foreign policy that is currently a hopeless money-losing operation in which our allies take us for fools and suck us dry. You could put the Sanders, Clinton, and Cruz foreign policies on a recognizable ideological spectrum, left to right. But not Trump’s. It inhabits a different space because it lacks any geopolitical coherence. It’s all about money. He sees no particular purpose for allies or foreign bases. They are simply a financial drain. RELATED: D.C.’s Foreign-Policy Establishment Spooked by ‘Bizarro’ Trump Team Imperial Spain roamed and ravaged the world in search of gold. Trump advocates a kinder, gentler form of wealth transfer from abroad, though equally gold-oriented. Thus, if Japan and South Korea don’t pony up more money for our troops stationed there, we go home. The possible effects on the balance of power in the Pacific Rim or on Chinese hegemonic designs don’t enter into the equation. Same for NATO. If those free-riding European leeches don’t give us more money too, why stick around? Concerns about tempting Russian ambitions and/or aggression are nowhere in sight. #related#The one exception to this singular focus on foreign policy as a form of national enrichment is the Islamic State. Trump’s goal is simple — “bomb the s*** out of them.” Yet even here he can’t quite stifle his mercantilist impulses, insisting that after crushing the Islamic State, he’ll keep their oil. Whatever that means. Closest historical analog: King Philip II of Spain (1556–98). On January 20, one of these four contenders will be sworn in as president. And one of these four approaches to the world will become the foreign policy of the United States. Don’t say you weren’t warned. — Charles Krauthammer is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2016 The Washington Post Writers Group.

Marc Thiessen to Megyn Kelly : Donald Trump Is a Liberal Pretending to be a Conservative

Conservatives BLAST Sean Hannity over 'UNITE' message

Republican front-runner’s poor standing with key voters is a major hurdle in the general election.

"I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about this," the Democratic front-runner said, as she pointed her finger at the activist.

Donald Trump, white nationalists, and the politics of the crowd.

Confused, shocked, bewildered. Just a few of the words used in recent days to describe Japan and South Korea's reaction to Donald Trump's latest comments.

There’s a new ordinance in Sugar Creek, Missouri, that restricts the use of agriculture on properties in the city. Nathan Athans believes it’s a witch hunt against him.

Become a FAN at https://www.facebook.com/stateofdaniel Become a PATRON at http://www.patreon.com/stateofdaniel Stay tuned for videos every Tuesday and Friday...

Janesville PD just wrapped up a news conference confirming what Gateway Pundit and Rebel Pundit already knew. The teen who ...

Don't even think about 'gender policing' the newly 'degendered' restrooms.

“I just donated to @tedcruz for President because he is the only true conservative left in the race. Donate here: https://t.co/K2RZRrPKJd”