ActRight

Center for Medical Progress Video Investigation -- Planned Parenthood Abortionist: 'Pay Attention to Who's in the Room' When Verifying Signs of Life

Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina in remarks on the House floor said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes should recuse himself from the panel investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. From The Hill: Jones, a member of the House Armed Services Committee who frequently bucks leadership, is the first Republican in Congress to call on Nunes to step aside. “How can you | Read More »

Officials from California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ office and Planned Parenthood collaborated to draft legislation targeting the pro-life activist whose undercover videos showed officials for the nation’s largest abortion provider discussing the sale of fetal body parts, emails show.

Attorney General Xavier Becerra uses privacy as a pretext for a political vendetta against critics of Planned Parenthood.

House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) remains under fire for his controversial meeting with an informant on White House grounds. Nunes claimed that he needed to go to the White House to use their Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF); the House Intelligence Committee has their own.

Under pressure from conservative activists, House Republican leaders and the White House say they have restarted negotiations.

It’s becoming increasingly clear that in the state of California, the right to abort a child is the chief liberty in the land, and all other liberties must bow before it. Few things illustrate this sad and morbid truth more than the decision of the California attorney general to prosecute (or, more accurately, persecute) David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt. Yesterday California charged Daleiden and Merrit with a whopping 15 felony counts based on their undercover videos — released through the Center for Medical Progress — showing Planned Parenthood officials discussing, among other things, harvesting and possibly even selling the organs of aborted babies. The heart of the indictment (14 of the 15 counts) is the claim that Daleiden and Merritt wrongly recorded alleged “confidential communications” between complete strangers at public conferences and at public restaurants. California’s case not only fails on the merits, it reeks of selective prosecution. There is no shortage of examples of concealed-camera videos in California exposing scandalous behavior (the Federalist’s Sean Davis has been tweeting them since the indictment), often in the arena of animal rights. In 2014, a group called Mercy for Animals released an undercover video that “allegedly show[ed] widespread animal abuse and cruelty at one of California’s largest duck farms.” Authorities reportedly responded to the video — by investigating the farm. In 2015, the same group released yet another undercover video, this time exposing “apparent mistreatment of chickens at a Foster Farms poultry slaughterhouse in Fresno and at three poultry farms in Fresno County.” Once again, authorities responded — once again by investigating the farm. But the lives and deaths of chickens and ducks rate higher than the lives and deaths of human babies in the womb, so the Center for Medical Progress triggered an entirely different law-enforcement reaction. Pro-life journalists must be prosecuted. Yet even if you divorce the case from its damning context, California’s case is hardly airtight. In fact, there’s a California case explicitly holding that state criminal law does not apply to undercover journalist recordings nearly identical to Daleiden’s. In Wilkins v. National Broadcasting Company, the victims of an undercover Dateline NBC sting sued NBC, alleging (among other things) that it violated California Penal Code Section 632 (the exact provision at issue in Daleiden’s case) when it taped a lunch meeting at a restaurant with a company salesperson. The court ruled for NBC, holding that the lunch meeting wasn’t a “confidential communication”: [NBC producers] Cloherty and Surles were virtual strangers to [company representatives] Wilkins and Scott, and the two people who accompanied them were total strangers, about whom Wilkins and Scott never inquired. Moreover, the topic of the lunch was SimTel’s business and Wilkins gave a sales pitch he had given to many others. Waiters frequently came to the table, but Wilkins did not acknowledge them, pause in his sales pitch, or even lower his voice.   Since the Wilkins case, the California Supreme Court slightly expanded the definition of “confidential communication” under the statute, but a quick survey of the relevant cases shows that it is difficult for even civil plaintiffs to prove that they had an “objectively reasonable expectation of privacy” in public locations. And make no mistake, the conversations at issue took place at public locations, including multiple restaurants and the 2014 National Abortion Federation conference. While the NAF sought to keep the contents of the conference itself confidential, it strains credulity that therefore every conversation at that conference was a “confidential communication” under California law. Indeed, when combining the facts of the case with California’s apparently selective prosecution, the state’s conduct raises serious First Amendment concerns. It’s true that the Constitution doesn’t empower reporters to break the law with impunity, but it’s also true that prosecutors don’t have a free hand to prosecute journalists they dislike while giving a free pass to reporters they deem sufficiently sympathetic. Prosecutorial discretion is a powerful weapon, and California is wielding it against life and for the abortion lobby. Fairness and law notwithstanding, Daleiden is clearly in for the fight of his legal life. California’s entire political establishment is growing ever-more repressive against people of faith and the pro-life movement. In close cases it may be difficult to find a sympathetic judge. Even here, with solid precedent on Daleiden’s side and a First Amendment that should tip the scales in his favor even further, progressive judges may be tempted to punish Planned Parenthood’s worst journalistic enemy. Big Abortion holds the Democratic party in a vise grip, and it now may use that power to send a man to prison for embarrassing the nation’s largest abortion provider. Two young journalists may pay a steep price for doing work that the Left admires — at least when reporters are protecting ducks and chickens. But babies in the womb? They only have the right to die. — David French is a staff writer for National Review, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, and an attorney.

Theresa May formally triggers the process of leaving the EU as negotiating battle lines are drawn.

California files charges against the Planned Parenthood undercover journalists, media clash with Trump, and we do some Bible talk!

Democrats are running a smear campaign against House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) after he revealed...

CNN has published a fact check exposing several falsehoods in a joke that WH Press Secretary Sean Spicer made Tuesday about salad dressing.

Over 21,000 people have signed a petition demanding EPA administrator Scott Pruitt meet with climate change activist and cult childhood television personality, Bill Nye “the science guy.” The petition — entitled “Time to send Scott Pruitt to climate school. Sit down with Bill Nye the Science Guy ASAP!” — accuses Pruitt of hypocrisy regarding the issue of climate change and aims to force him to have a sit-down with Nye. “We are sure Bill can get Administrator Pruitt to hear the truth, despite the political contributions from polluters whispering in his ears.” “Bill Nye the Science Guy has helped millions wrestle with challenging scientific concepts,” the petition states. “Sure, most of those folks were kids watching his popular television show, but we are sure Bill can get Administrator Pruitt to hear the truth, despite the political contributions from polluters whispering in his ears.” The petition itself is remarkable, not just for demanding a Cabinet-level official attend a lecture from a former children’s

President Trump has declined the offer to throw out the ceremonial first pitch on Opening Day in Washington D.C. this year. There is speculation that Trump may have refused the offer because he might get booed, since the tradition has been kept by presidents for over 100 years.

Last December, this same professor said "all I want for Christmas is white genocide."

Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email server while serving as Secretary of State is not only an enduring political scandal, it's also a new hit song. Per...

Vladimir Putin has hailed Iran as Russia’s most reliable and stable partner

The Supreme Court has had an opening since last year. Democrats who want to filibuster the confirmation of Trump's nominee, Neil Gorsuch are to blame.

Civil asset forfeiture is a national problem, and a big one.

A Northern Arizona University student lost credit on an English paper for using the word “mankind" instead of a gender-neutral alternative.

A Massachusetts lawmaker posted an online warning to illegal immigrants about an upcoming Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) "raid" in the area.

More than half the Democrats in the Senate say they will vote against President Donald Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, setting up an acrimonious showdown over Judge Neil Gorsuch’s bid to fill the seat.

After successfully prophesying that we would all soon be saying the two words "PRESIDENT TRUMP," left-wing pseudo-documentary maker Michael Moore employed his prognostication skills in the enigmatic realm of climatology.

Don’t return Sweden to the high taxes of the 1970s and 1980s.

Republican lawmakers in both the House and Senate aren't ready to walk away from efforts to pass legislation repealing and replacing Obamacare, even if it means compromise among conservatives or working with Democrats. It needs to be handled, Senate Republican Conference Chairman John Thune, R-S.D., said Tuesday, just days after President Trump indicated the effort is over for now. It's only a matter of time, I think, before it becomes clear something has to be done. Because Obamacare is in a death spiral and the insurance market is collapsing and we know that. Senate Republicans remain eager to tackle health insurance reform after the House failed in its effort last week because they believe the current law continues to disintegrate, particularly in states where insurers have quit the health insurance marketplace and costs have spiraled upwards. It's imploding in my state, said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. Something has to be done to protect the citizens and help them get health care they need and deserve.

Since when is moving to another country against the law? And since when do we enforce the laws we have on the books? I thought I knew, but I'm not a judge like this lady is, so I guess I was wrong.